J Minim Invasive Surg 2015; 18(2): 53-58
Published online June 15, 2015
https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2015.18.2.53
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
이관철, 정춘식
한솔병원 외과
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study describes our preliminary experience of a single incisional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) for inguinal hernia repair, compared to conventional TEP. Methods: From August 2012 to February 2014, 46 patients underwent inguinal hernia repair using a laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach by a single surgeon at Hansol Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Three patients were excluded due to a recurrent inguinal hernia; thus, 43 patients were enrolled in two groups, the single incisional TEP (STEP) group (n=23) and the conventional TEP (CTEP) group (n=20). The mean follow-up period was 15 months. Results: No differences in patient demographics (age, sex, hernia site and type, and body mass index) were detected between the two groups. The operation time in the STEP group was significantly longer than that in the CTEP group (69.7±28.5 vs. 51.0±16.4 min, p=0.017). No differences in postoperative complications were detected, including chronic pain, voiding difficulties, or the occurrence of a wound seroma (STEP, n=3 vs. CTEP, n=2). Pain scores (STEP, 1.4±0.7 vs. CTEP 1.4±0.8) and hospital stay duration (STEP, 1.0±0.2 vs. CTEP, 1.2±0.5 days) also did not differ between the groups. No patient in the STEP group required an additional port. Conclusion: Single incisional TEP was technically feasible, although it required a longer operation time. STEP appeared to have better cosmetic results compared with those of CTEP.
Keywords Inguinal hernia, Herniorrhaphy, Laparoscopy
J Minim Invasive Surg 2015; 18(2): 53-58
Published online June 15, 2015 https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2015.18.2.53
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
이관철, 정춘식
한솔병원 외과
Gwan Chul Lee, M.D., Choon Sik Chung, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Hansol Hospital, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study describes our preliminary experience of a single incisional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) for inguinal hernia repair, compared to conventional TEP. Methods: From August 2012 to February 2014, 46 patients underwent inguinal hernia repair using a laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach by a single surgeon at Hansol Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Three patients were excluded due to a recurrent inguinal hernia; thus, 43 patients were enrolled in two groups, the single incisional TEP (STEP) group (n=23) and the conventional TEP (CTEP) group (n=20). The mean follow-up period was 15 months. Results: No differences in patient demographics (age, sex, hernia site and type, and body mass index) were detected between the two groups. The operation time in the STEP group was significantly longer than that in the CTEP group (69.7±28.5 vs. 51.0±16.4 min, p=0.017). No differences in postoperative complications were detected, including chronic pain, voiding difficulties, or the occurrence of a wound seroma (STEP, n=3 vs. CTEP, n=2). Pain scores (STEP, 1.4±0.7 vs. CTEP 1.4±0.8) and hospital stay duration (STEP, 1.0±0.2 vs. CTEP, 1.2±0.5 days) also did not differ between the groups. No patient in the STEP group required an additional port. Conclusion: Single incisional TEP was technically feasible, although it required a longer operation time. STEP appeared to have better cosmetic results compared with those of CTEP.
Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Herniorrhaphy, Laparoscopy
Thanat Tantinam, Tawadchai Treeratanawikran, Pattiya Kamoncharoen, Ekawit Srimaneerak, Metpiya Siripoonsap, Thawatchai Phoonkaew
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 85-94Eun Jung Kim, Chaeyoun Oh, Jun Won Um
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2021; 24(4): 200-207Sungwoo Jung, Jin Ho Lee, Jae Uk Chong, Hyung Soon Lee
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2022; 25(1): 36-39