J Minim Invasive Surg 2015; 18(3): 75-78
Does Laparoscopic Splenectomy have the Advantage on Postoperative Pain?
Jae Ryong Shim, M.D., Sung Pil Yun, M.D., Hyung-Il Seo, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
Received: June 9, 2015; Revised: August 17, 2015; Accepted: August 18, 2015; Published online: September 15, 2015.
© The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons.

cc This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: The aim of this study is to elucidate the fundamental characteristics of the laparoscopic splenectomy and to compare the clinical outcomes and postoperative pain between the laparoscopic splenectomy and the conventional open splenectomy. Methods: From January 2005 to January 2013, 28 patients underwent a splenectomy at Pusan National University Hospital, South Korea (PNUH). This study was a comparison of the demographic features and clinical results between the laparoscopic splenectomy (n=15) and open splenectomy (n=13). Results: For the two groups of patients, the following were similar: estimated blood loss, transfusion, operative time, duration of patient-controlled analgesia, and the additional administration of painkillers. In the laparoscopic splenectomy group, the postoperative hospital stay (7.9±1.6 days versus 5.9±1.4 days, p=0.002) and the diet start time (2.7±0.3 days versus 1.8±0.8 days, p=0.003) were significantly shorter. No significant difference in postoperative pain was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: In this study, there was no benefit for postoperative pain in the LS group. However, the laparoscopic splenectomy has several benefits, including a shorter postoperative hospital stay and an earlier diet start time; in addition, it is feasible and safe.
Keywords: Laparoscopic splenectomy, Open splenectomy, Clinical outcomes
  1. Delaitre B, Maignien B. Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case. Presse medicale (Paris, France: 1983) 1990;20:22632263.
  2. Sharma D, Shukla VK. Laparoscopic splenectomy: 16 years since Delaitre with review of current literature. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2009;19:190-194.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Park A, Marcaccio M, Sternbach M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy. Archives of Surgery 1999;134:1263-1269.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Brunt LM, Langer JC, Quasebarth MA, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy. The American journal of surgery 1996;172:596-601.
  5. Winslow ER, Brunt LM. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis on complications. Surgery 2003;134:647-653.
  6. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:17-24.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Swarm RA, Abernethy AP, Anghelescu DL, et al. Adult cancer pain. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2013;11:992-1022.
  8. Rosen M, Brody F, Walsh RM, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy vs conventional laparoscopic splenectomy in cases of splenomegaly. Archives of Surgery 2002;137:1348-1352.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Bulus H, Mahmoud H, Altun H, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy. J Korean Surg Soc 2013;84:38-42.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Burch M, Misra M, Phillips EH. Splenic malignancy: a minimally invasive approach. The Cancer Journal 2005;11:36-42.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Walsh RM, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. The American journal of surgery 2002;183:192-196.
  12. Patel AG, Parker JE, Wallwork B, et al. Massive splenomegaly is associated with significant morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy. Annals of surgery 2003;238:235.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

This Article

Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Social Network Service


endnote template