Case Report

Split Viewer

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26(2): 83-87

Published online June 15, 2023

https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.83

© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery

Laparoscopic pancreas-preserving near total duodenectomy for large villous adenoma in patients with total colectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis

Dawn Jung1,2, Ji Eun Jung1, Chang Moo Kang1,2

1Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to : Chang Moo Kang
Division of Hepatobiliary and Panceatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
E-mail: cmkang@yuhs.ac
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658

Dawn Jung's current affiliation: Department of Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Received: October 16, 2022; Revised: November 25, 2022; Accepted: December 13, 2022

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Most familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients undergo total colectomy, but duodenal polyposis develops in up to 90% of patients with FAP and a 4% to 18% risk of duodenal and ampullary cancer remains. Laparoscopic pancreas-preserving near total duodenectomy is thought to be a potential option and can be an effective approach to preserve the pancreas. A 48-year-old male patient, who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy because of FAP with colorectal cancer, was diagnosed with a 20 mm-sized duodenal adenoma in the second to the third portion. The operation was performed on December 27, 2021. Near total duodenectomy was done and type II Billroth gastrojejunostomy was done. Laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is shown to be safe, with favorable short-term oncologic outcome compared to laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in terms of less blood loss, faster recovery time, and much less total cost.

Keywords Duodenal neoplasms, Minimally invasive surgery procedure, Duodenum

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterized by the development of thousands of adenomas in the rectum and colon during the second decade of life. FAP is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and results from a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis gene. Most patients with FAP receive total colectomy, but duodenal polyposis develops in up to 90% of patients with FAP, and with a 4% to 18% risk of duodenal and ampullary cancer remains [1].

The endoscopic approach is good for resection of a duodenum mass in FAP patients, but the surgical option should be considered when the number of tumors to be resected or the tumor is large. In managing premalignant lesions of the duodenum, a function-preserving and minimally invasive approach can be an ideal surgical option, because these patients are expected to have long-term survival. Not only oncologic outcome but also the quality of life should be considered in choosing a treatment option.

In this case, we present a laparoscopic pancreas-preserving near total duodenectomy (LPPTD) in a patient with previous total colectomy for FAP. This approach is thought to be a potential option and can be an effective approach to preserve the pancreas. Some concerns related to the present surgical approach will be discussed together.

Patient presentation

A 48-year-old male patient, who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy because of FAP with colorectal cancer, was diagnosed with a 20 mm-sized duodenal adenoma in the second to the third portion. Biopsy result was tubular adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (Fig. 1A, B).


Surgical technique

The operation was performed on December 22, 2021. With the patient in the supine position, we used total of six trocar ports (Fig. 2). First, we performed kocherization until the inferior vena cava and aorta were visible. Then, performed near total duodenectomy was with careful dissection from normal pancreas parenchyma, including part of ampulla of Vater. Then performed subserosal dissection separately (Fig. 3A, B). Pancreatico-biliary-jejunal anastomosis with one-layer, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with all interrupted sutures was performed. Finally, duodenojejunostomy was done (Fig. 3C, D; Fig. 4).



Postoperative outcomes

The postoperative period was uneventful. The patient started a soft diet four days after operation. On the 5th day after operation, the silastic open drain was removed and at the 6th postoperative day, routine postoperative computed tomography was done. There were no specific findings, so the patient was discharged in good health on the 7th postoperative day (Fig. 1C).

Pathological examination

Grossly, a 4.5 × 2.5-cm well-demarcated nodular mass was revealed, and the final diagnosis was tubulovillous adenoma of duodenum (Fig. 1D), and Spigelman classification of this patient was stage III.

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is standard option for treating periampullary pathologic conditions. However, in specific cases of benign or low-grade malignant tumor arising from the duodenum, a more limited alternative surgical procedure is thought to be ideal, because these patients are expecting long-term survival and the function of the gastrointestinal organs need to be preserved for the patients’ quality of life. Moreover, a minimally invasive approach is the best option.

The Spigelman classification [2] is the standard for classifying the presence of duodenal polyps in FAP patients. This classification divides patients into five stages according to the size, number, and degree of differentiation. Using this classification can help determine the procedure according to the tumor condition.

In line with this concept, we previously reported the technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial sleeve duodenectomy for an infraampullary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum [3], and laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is shown to be comparable safe and favorable short-term oncologic outcome comparing with laparoscopic PD in terms with less blood loss, much faster recovery time, and much less total cost [4].

The report of pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy was published in 1995 [5]; however, laparoscopic pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy was first described by Benetatos et al. [6] in a patient with FAP for duodenal polyposis. Similarly, Vega et al. [7] recently reported laparoscopic total duodenectomy by prepyloric gastric transection for two symptomatic duodenal adenomas.

Whether the method is pyloric preserving or not is still controversial in performing pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy. Traditionally, the pyloric ring is resected when total duodenectomy is recommended due to potential appearance of duodenal cancer arising from the duodenal remnant in FAP [8]. It is reported that duodenal cancer occurs in as many as 5% of cases of duodenal polyposis in FAP. However, in the present case, we performed LPPTD in patients with solitary large duodenal villous adenomatous polyp, who had undergone laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy for FAP. We preserved the pylorus by leaving a 1- to 2-cm proximal duodenal cuff instead of pyloric-ring transaction. The main functions of the pylorus are to prevent intestinal contents from reentering the stomach when the small intestine contracts and to limit the passage of large food particles or undigested material into the intestine. Therefore, a pylorus-preserving procedure was thought to be ideal for this patient. A small proportion of duodenal cuff is also sure to be easily accessed and evaluated by endoscopic gastroduodenscopic surveillance. Further study is necessary about these issues by way of more experiences and long-term follow-up results.

Some literatures have reported laparoscopic total duodenectomy, two-layered, duct-to-mucosa, pancreatico- and choledocho-jejunostomy [6,7,9]. However, we only performed duct-to-mucosa reimplantation for the biliary and pancreatic duct into the jejunum by single layer all interrupted sutures. It is thought that it is not necessary to perform two-layered anastomosis, because there is no pancreatic division as PD, and the whole pancreas is intact. Additional outer layer sutures may be somewhat more dangerous because there is a pancreatoduodenal vascular arcade between the gastroduodenal artery and inferior pancreatoduodenal artery around the pancreatic head.

In summary, LPPTD seems to be a feasible and safe procedure, and LPPTD can be an option when a duodenal lesion occurs in FAP patients who have undergone total colectomy.

Ethical statements

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine with a waiver of informed consent (No. 4-2022-0301).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision: CMK

Formal analysis, Investigation: JEJ

Methodology: DJ

Writing–original draft: DJ

Writing–review & editing: All authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding/support

None.

Fig. 1. (A) Preoperative endoscopy finding. (B) Preoperative computed tomography finding. (C) Postoperative patient operation wound. (D) Pathological gross image.
Fig. 2. Location of the trocar during surgery.
Fig. 3. Finding during operation of laparoscopic total duodenectomy. (A) Resection phase. D, dissected duodenum; P, pancreas. (B) After resection, check the position of the ducts (pancreatic duct). (C) Reconstruction phase. (D) After reconstruction. J, jejunum; P, pancreas; GB, gallbladder; arrow, anastomosis site.
Fig. 4. Anatomical illustration after pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy.
  1. Half E, Bercovich D, Rozen P. Familial adenomatous polyposis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2009;4:22.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Spigelman AD, Talbot IC, Penna C, et al. Evidence for adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the duodenum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The Leeds Castle Polyposis Group (Upper Gastrointestinal Committee). J Clin Pathol 1994;47:709-710.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Choi SH, Park J, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Laparoscopic partial sleeve duodenectomy for the infra-ampullary gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum. World J Surg 2018;42:4005-4013.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Lu C, Jin W, Mou Y, et al. Optimal laparoscopic management and oncological outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in duodenum: pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy? Cancer Manag Res 2020;12:4725-4734.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Chung RS, Church JM, vanStolk R. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: indications, surgical technique, and results. Surgery 1995;117:254-259.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Benetatos N, Ammori MB, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011;21:e332-e335.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Vega EA, Salehi O, Nicolaescu DC, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic head preserving total duodenectomy: the parenchymal sparing alternative to a whipple. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:131-132.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Lundell L, Hyltander A, Liedman B. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: technique and indications. Eur J Surg 2002;168:74-77.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Stauffer JA, Adkisson CD, Riegert-Johnson DL, Goldberg RF, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ. Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for ampullary duodenal neoplasms. World J Surg 2012;36:2461-2472.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Case Report

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26(2): 83-87

Published online June 15, 2023 https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.83

Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.

Laparoscopic pancreas-preserving near total duodenectomy for large villous adenoma in patients with total colectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis

Dawn Jung1,2, Ji Eun Jung1, Chang Moo Kang1,2

1Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:Chang Moo Kang
Division of Hepatobiliary and Panceatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
E-mail: cmkang@yuhs.ac
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658

Dawn Jung's current affiliation: Department of Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Received: October 16, 2022; Revised: November 25, 2022; Accepted: December 13, 2022

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Most familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients undergo total colectomy, but duodenal polyposis develops in up to 90% of patients with FAP and a 4% to 18% risk of duodenal and ampullary cancer remains. Laparoscopic pancreas-preserving near total duodenectomy is thought to be a potential option and can be an effective approach to preserve the pancreas. A 48-year-old male patient, who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy because of FAP with colorectal cancer, was diagnosed with a 20 mm-sized duodenal adenoma in the second to the third portion. The operation was performed on December 27, 2021. Near total duodenectomy was done and type II Billroth gastrojejunostomy was done. Laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is shown to be safe, with favorable short-term oncologic outcome compared to laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in terms of less blood loss, faster recovery time, and much less total cost.

Keywords: Duodenal neoplasms, Minimally invasive surgery procedure, Duodenum

INTRODUCTION

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterized by the development of thousands of adenomas in the rectum and colon during the second decade of life. FAP is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and results from a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis gene. Most patients with FAP receive total colectomy, but duodenal polyposis develops in up to 90% of patients with FAP, and with a 4% to 18% risk of duodenal and ampullary cancer remains [1].

The endoscopic approach is good for resection of a duodenum mass in FAP patients, but the surgical option should be considered when the number of tumors to be resected or the tumor is large. In managing premalignant lesions of the duodenum, a function-preserving and minimally invasive approach can be an ideal surgical option, because these patients are expected to have long-term survival. Not only oncologic outcome but also the quality of life should be considered in choosing a treatment option.

In this case, we present a laparoscopic pancreas-preserving near total duodenectomy (LPPTD) in a patient with previous total colectomy for FAP. This approach is thought to be a potential option and can be an effective approach to preserve the pancreas. Some concerns related to the present surgical approach will be discussed together.

CASE REPORT

Patient presentation

A 48-year-old male patient, who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy because of FAP with colorectal cancer, was diagnosed with a 20 mm-sized duodenal adenoma in the second to the third portion. Biopsy result was tubular adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (Fig. 1A, B).


Surgical technique

The operation was performed on December 22, 2021. With the patient in the supine position, we used total of six trocar ports (Fig. 2). First, we performed kocherization until the inferior vena cava and aorta were visible. Then, performed near total duodenectomy was with careful dissection from normal pancreas parenchyma, including part of ampulla of Vater. Then performed subserosal dissection separately (Fig. 3A, B). Pancreatico-biliary-jejunal anastomosis with one-layer, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with all interrupted sutures was performed. Finally, duodenojejunostomy was done (Fig. 3C, D; Fig. 4).



Postoperative outcomes

The postoperative period was uneventful. The patient started a soft diet four days after operation. On the 5th day after operation, the silastic open drain was removed and at the 6th postoperative day, routine postoperative computed tomography was done. There were no specific findings, so the patient was discharged in good health on the 7th postoperative day (Fig. 1C).

Pathological examination

Grossly, a 4.5 × 2.5-cm well-demarcated nodular mass was revealed, and the final diagnosis was tubulovillous adenoma of duodenum (Fig. 1D), and Spigelman classification of this patient was stage III.

DISCUSSION

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is standard option for treating periampullary pathologic conditions. However, in specific cases of benign or low-grade malignant tumor arising from the duodenum, a more limited alternative surgical procedure is thought to be ideal, because these patients are expecting long-term survival and the function of the gastrointestinal organs need to be preserved for the patients’ quality of life. Moreover, a minimally invasive approach is the best option.

The Spigelman classification [2] is the standard for classifying the presence of duodenal polyps in FAP patients. This classification divides patients into five stages according to the size, number, and degree of differentiation. Using this classification can help determine the procedure according to the tumor condition.

In line with this concept, we previously reported the technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial sleeve duodenectomy for an infraampullary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum [3], and laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is shown to be comparable safe and favorable short-term oncologic outcome comparing with laparoscopic PD in terms with less blood loss, much faster recovery time, and much less total cost [4].

The report of pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy was published in 1995 [5]; however, laparoscopic pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy was first described by Benetatos et al. [6] in a patient with FAP for duodenal polyposis. Similarly, Vega et al. [7] recently reported laparoscopic total duodenectomy by prepyloric gastric transection for two symptomatic duodenal adenomas.

Whether the method is pyloric preserving or not is still controversial in performing pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy. Traditionally, the pyloric ring is resected when total duodenectomy is recommended due to potential appearance of duodenal cancer arising from the duodenal remnant in FAP [8]. It is reported that duodenal cancer occurs in as many as 5% of cases of duodenal polyposis in FAP. However, in the present case, we performed LPPTD in patients with solitary large duodenal villous adenomatous polyp, who had undergone laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy for FAP. We preserved the pylorus by leaving a 1- to 2-cm proximal duodenal cuff instead of pyloric-ring transaction. The main functions of the pylorus are to prevent intestinal contents from reentering the stomach when the small intestine contracts and to limit the passage of large food particles or undigested material into the intestine. Therefore, a pylorus-preserving procedure was thought to be ideal for this patient. A small proportion of duodenal cuff is also sure to be easily accessed and evaluated by endoscopic gastroduodenscopic surveillance. Further study is necessary about these issues by way of more experiences and long-term follow-up results.

Some literatures have reported laparoscopic total duodenectomy, two-layered, duct-to-mucosa, pancreatico- and choledocho-jejunostomy [6,7,9]. However, we only performed duct-to-mucosa reimplantation for the biliary and pancreatic duct into the jejunum by single layer all interrupted sutures. It is thought that it is not necessary to perform two-layered anastomosis, because there is no pancreatic division as PD, and the whole pancreas is intact. Additional outer layer sutures may be somewhat more dangerous because there is a pancreatoduodenal vascular arcade between the gastroduodenal artery and inferior pancreatoduodenal artery around the pancreatic head.

In summary, LPPTD seems to be a feasible and safe procedure, and LPPTD can be an option when a duodenal lesion occurs in FAP patients who have undergone total colectomy.

NOTES

Ethical statements

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine with a waiver of informed consent (No. 4-2022-0301).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision: CMK

Formal analysis, Investigation: JEJ

Methodology: DJ

Writing–original draft: DJ

Writing–review & editing: All authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding/support

None.

Fig. 1.(A) Preoperative endoscopy finding. (B) Preoperative computed tomography finding. (C) Postoperative patient operation wound. (D) Pathological gross image.
Fig. 2.Location of the trocar during surgery.
Fig. 3.Finding during operation of laparoscopic total duodenectomy. (A) Resection phase. D, dissected duodenum; P, pancreas. (B) After resection, check the position of the ducts (pancreatic duct). (C) Reconstruction phase. (D) After reconstruction. J, jejunum; P, pancreas; GB, gallbladder; arrow, anastomosis site.
Fig. 4.Anatomical illustration after pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.(A) Preoperative endoscopy finding. (B) Preoperative computed tomography finding. (C) Postoperative patient operation wound. (D) Pathological gross image.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26: 83-87https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.83

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Location of the trocar during surgery.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26: 83-87https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.83

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Finding during operation of laparoscopic total duodenectomy. (A) Resection phase. D, dissected duodenum; P, pancreas. (B) After resection, check the position of the ducts (pancreatic duct). (C) Reconstruction phase. (D) After reconstruction. J, jejunum; P, pancreas; GB, gallbladder; arrow, anastomosis site.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26: 83-87https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.83

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Anatomical illustration after pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26: 83-87https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.83

References

  1. Half E, Bercovich D, Rozen P. Familial adenomatous polyposis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2009;4:22.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Spigelman AD, Talbot IC, Penna C, et al. Evidence for adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the duodenum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The Leeds Castle Polyposis Group (Upper Gastrointestinal Committee). J Clin Pathol 1994;47:709-710.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Choi SH, Park J, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Laparoscopic partial sleeve duodenectomy for the infra-ampullary gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum. World J Surg 2018;42:4005-4013.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Lu C, Jin W, Mou Y, et al. Optimal laparoscopic management and oncological outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in duodenum: pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy? Cancer Manag Res 2020;12:4725-4734.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Chung RS, Church JM, vanStolk R. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: indications, surgical technique, and results. Surgery 1995;117:254-259.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Benetatos N, Ammori MB, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011;21:e332-e335.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Vega EA, Salehi O, Nicolaescu DC, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic head preserving total duodenectomy: the parenchymal sparing alternative to a whipple. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:131-132.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Lundell L, Hyltander A, Liedman B. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy: technique and indications. Eur J Surg 2002;168:74-77.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Stauffer JA, Adkisson CD, Riegert-Johnson DL, Goldberg RF, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ. Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for ampullary duodenal neoplasms. World J Surg 2012;36:2461-2472.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Share this article on

  • kakao talk
  • line

Related articles in JMIS

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

pISSN 2234-778X
eISSN 2234-5248