J Minim Invasive Surg 2002; 5(2): 154-159
Published online December 31, 2002
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
장내성·최성일·이우용·전호경
성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 소화기센터, 외과
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has long learning curve because of complex mesenteric blood supply, multiple quadrant location and bowel anastomosis. The aim of this study was to identify the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Methods: From April 2000 to July 2002, Ninety laparoscopic colectomy were performed at Samsung Medical Center. The cases were divided into 3 groups: 1 to 30 Cases as early group, 31 to 60 cases as intermediate group and 61 to 90 cases as late group. As for type of surgery, total 48 cases of anterior resection were divided as 2 groups (AR-early group and AR-late group), total 20 cases of right hemicolectomy were divided as 2 groups (RH-early group and RH-late group). We retrospectively analyzed conversion rate, operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay and complication rate.
Results: The conversion rate was significantly higher in early group (3 cases, 10.0%) than intermediate group (0 case, 0.0%) and late group (0 case, 0.0%: p<0.04). The reasons for conversion were postoperative adhesive band, anatomical variation of greater omentum and mesenteric lymph node enlargement. Mean operative time declined significantly from early group (179⁑49 minutes) to intermediate group (151⁑34 minutes) and late group (148⁑39 minutes: p<0.008). Comparing postoperative length of hospital stay, there were no differences in early group (7.6⁑1.0 days), intermediate group (7.4⁑1.1 days) and late group (7.0⁑0.7 days: p<0.07). Complication consisted of urinary retension (4 cases), anastomotic site delayed bleeding (3 cases), chyle leakage (3 cases) and wound infection (one case). The complication rate showed no differences between three groups (p<0.26). There were no significant difference between early group and late group of anterior resection, 0.26). There were no significant difference between early group and late group of anterior resection, and also right hemicolectomy.
Conclusion: Based on a decline in conversion rate, operative time and complication, this study showed that learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery did not take as much time, and the estimated learning curve for performing colorectal surgery was approximately 30 cases.
Keywords Learning curve, Laparoscopy, Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
J Minim Invasive Surg 2002; 5(2): 154-159
Published online December 31, 2002
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
장내성·최성일·이우용·전호경
성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 소화기센터, 외과
Nae Sung Jang, M.D., Sung Il Choi, M.D., Woo Yong Lee, M.D., Ho Kyung Chun, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkawan University School of Medicine
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has long learning curve because of complex mesenteric blood supply, multiple quadrant location and bowel anastomosis. The aim of this study was to identify the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Methods: From April 2000 to July 2002, Ninety laparoscopic colectomy were performed at Samsung Medical Center. The cases were divided into 3 groups: 1 to 30 Cases as early group, 31 to 60 cases as intermediate group and 61 to 90 cases as late group. As for type of surgery, total 48 cases of anterior resection were divided as 2 groups (AR-early group and AR-late group), total 20 cases of right hemicolectomy were divided as 2 groups (RH-early group and RH-late group). We retrospectively analyzed conversion rate, operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay and complication rate.
Results: The conversion rate was significantly higher in early group (3 cases, 10.0%) than intermediate group (0 case, 0.0%) and late group (0 case, 0.0%: p<0.04). The reasons for conversion were postoperative adhesive band, anatomical variation of greater omentum and mesenteric lymph node enlargement. Mean operative time declined significantly from early group (179⁑49 minutes) to intermediate group (151⁑34 minutes) and late group (148⁑39 minutes: p<0.008). Comparing postoperative length of hospital stay, there were no differences in early group (7.6⁑1.0 days), intermediate group (7.4⁑1.1 days) and late group (7.0⁑0.7 days: p<0.07). Complication consisted of urinary retension (4 cases), anastomotic site delayed bleeding (3 cases), chyle leakage (3 cases) and wound infection (one case). The complication rate showed no differences between three groups (p<0.26). There were no significant difference between early group and late group of anterior resection, 0.26). There were no significant difference between early group and late group of anterior resection, and also right hemicolectomy.
Conclusion: Based on a decline in conversion rate, operative time and complication, this study showed that learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery did not take as much time, and the estimated learning curve for performing colorectal surgery was approximately 30 cases.
Keywords: Learning curve, Laparoscopy, Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Thanat Tantinam, Tawadchai Treeratanawikran, Pattiya Kamoncharoen, Ekawit Srimaneerak, Metpiya Siripoonsap, Thawatchai Phoonkaew
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 85-94Seung Hyun Lim, M.D., Jeonghyun Kang, M.D., Younghae Song, M.D., Im-kyung Kim, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 2014; 17(4): 75-79Jung Seob Lee, M.D., Il Dong Kim, M.D., Ki Ho Kim, M.D., Dong Woo Shin, M.D.,Byung Sun Suh, M.D., Sang Wook Kim, M.D., Hye In Lim, M.D., Jin Soo Park, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 134-138