J Minim Invasive Surg 2004; 7(2): 90-98
Published online December 30, 2004
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
윤유석·한호성·최유신·이상일·장진영·서경석·김선회·이건욱·박용현
서울대학교 의과대학 외과학교실
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Despite recent increasing reports on laparoscopic liver resection, it is only being performed at a limited number of institutions due to technical difficulties. This study was performed to evaluate the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection by analyzing our experiences of laparoscopic left-side liver resection. Methods: A total of 22 cases of total laparoscopic liver resection were performed between May 2003 and October 2004. Of those cases, we selected 16 cases of laparoscopic left-side liver resection (left lateral sectionectomy: 11 cases, left hemihepatectomy: 5 cases). Indications were intrahepatic duct stones (n=10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=3), and benign tumors (n=3). The cases were divided into sequential two groups of 8. Operative time, intra-operative transfusion, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in sex, age, indications, and operation type between two groups. Compared with early group, late group was associated with a shorter operation time (456.3 vs. 262.5 minutes, p=0.007), a decreased intra-operative transfusion (2.6 vs. 0.3 units, p=0.083), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (16.6 vs. 10.3 days, p=0.094). Three cases (37.5%) (sepsis, bile leakage, intra-abdominal fluid collection) of postoperative complications and one case of postoperative mortalitywere present in early group. However, there were no postoperative complication and mortality in late group. Conclusion: Despite a limited number of cases, this study demonstrates that clinical outcome of laparoscopic liver resection was improved by accumulation of experiences. Therefore, we believe that more experiences of laparoscopic liver resection will contribute to overcoming its technical difficulty that limits its wide acceptance.
Keywords Laparoscopy, Liver resection, Learning curve
J Minim Invasive Surg 2004; 7(2): 90-98
Published online December 30, 2004
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
윤유석·한호성·최유신·이상일·장진영·서경석·김선회·이건욱·박용현
서울대학교 의과대학 외과학교실
Yoo-Seok Yoon, M.D., Ho-Seong Han, M.D., Yoo Shin Choi, M.D., Sang Il Lee, M.D., Jin-Young Jang, M.D., Kyung-Suk Suh, M.D., Sun-Whe Kim, M.D., Kuhn Uk Lee, M.D., Yong-Hyun Park, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Despite recent increasing reports on laparoscopic liver resection, it is only being performed at a limited number of institutions due to technical difficulties. This study was performed to evaluate the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection by analyzing our experiences of laparoscopic left-side liver resection. Methods: A total of 22 cases of total laparoscopic liver resection were performed between May 2003 and October 2004. Of those cases, we selected 16 cases of laparoscopic left-side liver resection (left lateral sectionectomy: 11 cases, left hemihepatectomy: 5 cases). Indications were intrahepatic duct stones (n=10), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=3), and benign tumors (n=3). The cases were divided into sequential two groups of 8. Operative time, intra-operative transfusion, postoperative hospital stay, and complications were analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in sex, age, indications, and operation type between two groups. Compared with early group, late group was associated with a shorter operation time (456.3 vs. 262.5 minutes, p=0.007), a decreased intra-operative transfusion (2.6 vs. 0.3 units, p=0.083), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (16.6 vs. 10.3 days, p=0.094). Three cases (37.5%) (sepsis, bile leakage, intra-abdominal fluid collection) of postoperative complications and one case of postoperative mortalitywere present in early group. However, there were no postoperative complication and mortality in late group. Conclusion: Despite a limited number of cases, this study demonstrates that clinical outcome of laparoscopic liver resection was improved by accumulation of experiences. Therefore, we believe that more experiences of laparoscopic liver resection will contribute to overcoming its technical difficulty that limits its wide acceptance.
Keywords: Laparoscopy, Liver resection, Learning curve
Thanat Tantinam, Tawadchai Treeratanawikran, Pattiya Kamoncharoen, Ekawit Srimaneerak, Metpiya Siripoonsap, Thawatchai Phoonkaew
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 85-94Woohyung Lee, Jae Yool Jang, Soon-Chan Hong, and Chi-Young Jeong
J Minim Invasive Surg 2017; 20(2): 69-73Seung Hyun Lim, M.D., Jeonghyun Kang, M.D., Younghae Song, M.D., Im-kyung Kim, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 2014; 17(4): 75-79