J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(1): 22-25
Published online June 15, 2010
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
강 우 형ㆍ김 범 수ㆍ최 윤 백
울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 외과학교실
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in laparoscopic adrenalectomy for resectable adrenal mass.
Methods: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed on 134 patients with resectable adrenal mass between February 2004 and February 2009. We retrospectively reviewed the results of transperitoneal approach (TPA) and that of retroperitoneal approach (RPA) in terms of clinicopathologics and surgical outcomes.
Results: 80 patients (39 men and 41 women) underwent TPA, of them, 68 were located in left and 12 were located in right. 54 patients (25 men and 29 women) underwent RPA. In RPA group, 9 were located in left and 45 were located in right. There were no difference in clinicopathologics (including age, gender and BMI), in postoperative complication and in mortality. Operative time was shorter, blood loss was smaller and less pain killers was administered in RPA group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Our study shows that both approach (TPA and RPA) have a good peri-operative outcomes, but RPA is less painful and has a shorter operative time than TPA. It is needed to choose operative approach based on certain patient selection criteria for high patient and surgeon satisfaction.
Keywords Adrenalectomy, Transperitoneal, Retroperitoneal, Laparoscopy
J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(1): 22-25
Published online June 15, 2010
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
강 우 형ㆍ김 범 수ㆍ최 윤 백
울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 외과학교실
Woo Hyoung Kang, M.D., Beom Su Kim, M.D., Youn Baik Choi, M.D.
Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in laparoscopic adrenalectomy for resectable adrenal mass.
Methods: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed on 134 patients with resectable adrenal mass between February 2004 and February 2009. We retrospectively reviewed the results of transperitoneal approach (TPA) and that of retroperitoneal approach (RPA) in terms of clinicopathologics and surgical outcomes.
Results: 80 patients (39 men and 41 women) underwent TPA, of them, 68 were located in left and 12 were located in right. 54 patients (25 men and 29 women) underwent RPA. In RPA group, 9 were located in left and 45 were located in right. There were no difference in clinicopathologics (including age, gender and BMI), in postoperative complication and in mortality. Operative time was shorter, blood loss was smaller and less pain killers was administered in RPA group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Our study shows that both approach (TPA and RPA) have a good peri-operative outcomes, but RPA is less painful and has a shorter operative time than TPA. It is needed to choose operative approach based on certain patient selection criteria for high patient and surgeon satisfaction.
Keywords: Adrenalectomy, Transperitoneal, Retroperitoneal, Laparoscopy
Myung-Soo Lee, M.D., Sehwan Han, M.D., Hyeon-Cheol Kang, M.D., Seok-Yong Ryu, M.D., Hong-Joo Kim, M.D., Young-Duck Kim, M.D., Hong-Yong Kim, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 1998; 1(1): 131-138Jae Hwan Jeong, Chang Moo Kang
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(4): 227-231Jun Seong Chung, Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(4): 221-226