Original Article

J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(1): 26-30

Published online June 15, 2010

© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery

절개창탈장 처치에 적용한 복강경복원술과 개방성복원술의 비교

이 성 현ㆍ김 범 수ㆍ최 윤 백

울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 외과학교실

The Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repairs

Seong Hyun Lee, M.D., Beom Su Kim, M.D., Youn Baik Choi, M.D.

Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a prospective study for the purpose of analyzing and comparing outcomes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repairs.
Methods: Open incisional hernia repair with Rives-Stoppa method was performed on 35 patients between April 2003 and March 2008. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) was performed on 35 patients during the same periods. Clinical features and surgical outcomes were compared in both groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in patients' clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in defect size, location and surgical complication. While, the operation time and hospital stay were shorter, and postoperative pain was less in laparoscopic repair group (p<0.05). There was one recurrence in laparoscopic group and there were three recurrences in open group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is safe and feasible procedure comparing to open method. We suggest that laparoscopic repair is initially recommended for incisional hernia if there is no contraindication or excessive adhesion.

Keywords Incisional and ventral hernia, Open hernia repair, Laparoscopy, Mesh

Article

Original Article

J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(1): 26-30

Published online June 15, 2010

Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.

절개창탈장 처치에 적용한 복강경복원술과 개방성복원술의 비교

이 성 현ㆍ김 범 수ㆍ최 윤 백

울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 외과학교실

The Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repairs

Seong Hyun Lee, M.D., Beom Su Kim, M.D., Youn Baik Choi, M.D.

Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a prospective study for the purpose of analyzing and comparing outcomes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repairs.
Methods: Open incisional hernia repair with Rives-Stoppa method was performed on 35 patients between April 2003 and March 2008. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) was performed on 35 patients during the same periods. Clinical features and surgical outcomes were compared in both groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in patients' clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in defect size, location and surgical complication. While, the operation time and hospital stay were shorter, and postoperative pain was less in laparoscopic repair group (p<0.05). There was one recurrence in laparoscopic group and there were three recurrences in open group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is safe and feasible procedure comparing to open method. We suggest that laparoscopic repair is initially recommended for incisional hernia if there is no contraindication or excessive adhesion.

Keywords: Incisional and ventral hernia, Open hernia repair, Laparoscopy, Mesh

Share this article on

  • kakao talk
  • line

Related articles in JMIS

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

pISSN 2234-778X
eISSN 2234-5248