J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(1): 26-30
Published online June 15, 2010
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
이 성 현ㆍ김 범 수ㆍ최 윤 백
울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 외과학교실
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: We performed a prospective study for the purpose of analyzing and comparing outcomes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repairs.
Methods: Open incisional hernia repair with Rives-Stoppa method was performed on 35 patients between April 2003 and March 2008. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) was performed on 35 patients during the same periods. Clinical features and surgical outcomes were compared in both groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in patients' clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in defect size, location and surgical complication. While, the operation time and hospital stay were shorter, and postoperative pain was less in laparoscopic repair group (p<0.05). There was one recurrence in laparoscopic group and there were three recurrences in open group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is safe and feasible procedure comparing to open method. We suggest that laparoscopic repair is initially recommended for incisional hernia if there is no contraindication or excessive adhesion.
Keywords Incisional and ventral hernia, Open hernia repair, Laparoscopy, Mesh
J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(1): 26-30
Published online June 15, 2010
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
이 성 현ㆍ김 범 수ㆍ최 윤 백
울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 외과학교실
Seong Hyun Lee, M.D., Beom Su Kim, M.D., Youn Baik Choi, M.D.
Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: We performed a prospective study for the purpose of analyzing and comparing outcomes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repairs.
Methods: Open incisional hernia repair with Rives-Stoppa method was performed on 35 patients between April 2003 and March 2008. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) was performed on 35 patients during the same periods. Clinical features and surgical outcomes were compared in both groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in patients' clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in defect size, location and surgical complication. While, the operation time and hospital stay were shorter, and postoperative pain was less in laparoscopic repair group (p<0.05). There was one recurrence in laparoscopic group and there were three recurrences in open group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is safe and feasible procedure comparing to open method. We suggest that laparoscopic repair is initially recommended for incisional hernia if there is no contraindication or excessive adhesion.
Keywords: Incisional and ventral hernia, Open hernia repair, Laparoscopy, Mesh
Symeonidou Elissavet, Gkoutziotis Ioannis, Petras Panagiotis, Mpallas Konstantinos, Kamparoudis Apostolos
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2023; 26(3): 134-145Kwang Hyun Kim, Eui Hyuk Chong, Incheon Kang, Sung Hwan Lee, Seok Jeong Yang
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 118-124Thanat Tantinam, Tawadchai Treeratanawikran, Pattiya Kamoncharoen, Ekawit Srimaneerak, Metpiya Siripoonsap, Thawatchai Phoonkaew
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 85-94