J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 74-79
Published online December 15, 2010
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
양용제ㆍ김일동ㆍ김기호ㆍ박진수ㆍ서병선ㆍ김상욱ㆍ임혜인ㆍ신동우
대진의료재단 분당제생병원 외과학교실
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Laparoscopic appendectomy has many benefits compared to the open technique, such as easy localization of the appendix, less scarring for cosmetic reasons and less reported wound infection. However, for patients with complicated appendicitis, controversy exists as to whether laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure. Some recent studies have reported no significant difference of the complication rate compared to that of the open procedure, suggesting that laparoscopic appendectomy could be used as an alternative procedure. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy as compared to that of the open technique for treating complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.
Methods: We studied the patients who underwent appendectomy by either the laparoscopic or open technique at Bundang Jaesaeang General Hospital between January 2005 and September 2008. Of the total 2,226 patients, there were 168 patients in the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group and 2,058 patients in the open appendectomy (OA) group. We compared the patient demographic data and perioperative outcomes of the two groups.
Results: Both patient groups were comparable in terms of age. The mean operative time was 91.8 minutes in the LA group and 47.2 minutes in the OA group (p<0.00). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay. The noncomplicated appendicitis LA group showed a quicker time to start an oral diet (p=0.03) & wound infection (p=0.032). For complicated appendicitis, there were no differences of wound infection & intestinal obstruction between the two groups.
Conclusion: Although laparoscopic appendectomies requires a longer operation time, it did not lengthen the hospital stay nor delay the start of a soft oral diet. Appendiceal abscess in complicated appendicitis did not occur in the laparoscopic or open appendectomy groups. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for both complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. To reach a final consensus on the scope of this study, a prospective randomized controlled study is needed in the near future.
Keywords Noncomplicated appendicitis, Complicated appendicitis, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Postoperative complications
J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 74-79
Published online December 15, 2010
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
양용제ㆍ김일동ㆍ김기호ㆍ박진수ㆍ서병선ㆍ김상욱ㆍ임혜인ㆍ신동우
대진의료재단 분당제생병원 외과학교실
Yong Je Yang, M.D., Il Dong Kim, M.D., Ki Ho Kim, M.D., Jin Soo Park, M.D., Byung Sun Suh, M.D., Sang Wook Kim, M.D., Hye In Lim, M.D., Dong Woo Shin, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Daejin Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Laparoscopic appendectomy has many benefits compared to the open technique, such as easy localization of the appendix, less scarring for cosmetic reasons and less reported wound infection. However, for patients with complicated appendicitis, controversy exists as to whether laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure. Some recent studies have reported no significant difference of the complication rate compared to that of the open procedure, suggesting that laparoscopic appendectomy could be used as an alternative procedure. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy as compared to that of the open technique for treating complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.
Methods: We studied the patients who underwent appendectomy by either the laparoscopic or open technique at Bundang Jaesaeang General Hospital between January 2005 and September 2008. Of the total 2,226 patients, there were 168 patients in the laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group and 2,058 patients in the open appendectomy (OA) group. We compared the patient demographic data and perioperative outcomes of the two groups.
Results: Both patient groups were comparable in terms of age. The mean operative time was 91.8 minutes in the LA group and 47.2 minutes in the OA group (p<0.00). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay. The noncomplicated appendicitis LA group showed a quicker time to start an oral diet (p=0.03) & wound infection (p=0.032). For complicated appendicitis, there were no differences of wound infection & intestinal obstruction between the two groups.
Conclusion: Although laparoscopic appendectomies requires a longer operation time, it did not lengthen the hospital stay nor delay the start of a soft oral diet. Appendiceal abscess in complicated appendicitis did not occur in the laparoscopic or open appendectomy groups. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for both complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. To reach a final consensus on the scope of this study, a prospective randomized controlled study is needed in the near future.
Keywords: Noncomplicated appendicitis, Complicated appendicitis, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Postoperative complications
Hyun Jung Choi, M.D., Yong Jin Kim, M.D., Zisun Kim, M.D., Yoon Young Choi, M.D., Sung Woo Cho, M.D., Hee Doo Woo, M.D., Dongho Choi, M.D., Kyung Yul Hur, M.D., Jae Joon Kim, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 2011; 14(1): 7-11Jong Seok Lee, M.D., Joo Seop Kim, M.D., Samuel Lee, M.D., Doo Jin Kim, M.D., Jin Cheol Jung, M.D., Chan Heun Park, M.D., Jun Ho Park, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 2009; 12(1): 26-30Jae-Yeon Jung, M.D., Woo-Yong Lee, M.D., Keun-Ho Yang, M.D., Byung-No Bae, M.D., Ki-Hwan Kim, M.D., Se- Whan Han, M.D., Hong-Joo Kim, M.D., Young-Duk Kim, M.D.
J Minim Invasive Surg 2007; 10(1): 39-44