J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 139-143
Published online December 15, 2010
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
정춘식ㆍ이정은ㆍ조용걸ㆍ유상화ㆍ정규영ㆍ김승한ㆍ이동근
한솔병원 외과
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) has an advantage for evaluating the viability of incarcerated bowel. In this retrospective study, we aimed to review the data for use of the TEP technique in treating incarcerated hernias in order to document the feasibility of the laparoscopic procedure.
Methods: During a 2-year period from January 2008 to December 2009, one surgeon (C.S) at our institution operated on 27 patients with acutely (n=3) or chronically (n=24) incarcerated hernia. Incarcerated hernias were divided into acute or chronic types arbitrarily, based on who had symptoms of acute abdominal pain and signs of intestinal obstruction. For acute cases, the TEP procedure was done following laparoscopic transperitoneal evaluation to assess viability of the incarcerated bowel.
Results: All patients except one having a femoral hernia were male. Mean age was 41 years old (range, 25∼75). No case converted from a laparoscopic to an open procedure. Two acute incarcerated cases contained a segment of small bowel and the other contained small bowel and omentum. All acute cases were operated on successfully on an emergency basis by laparoscopic TEP repair. All chronic cases contained omentum without bowel. In one case of acute and seven cases of chronic type, a small inguinal incision was made to reduce hernia contents. No recurrence was noticed at a mean of 13 months of follow-up.
Conclusion: If there is no entrapment of bowel in chronic incarcerated cases, the TEP procedure will be satisfactory. It may be reasonable, however, to evaluate viability of bowel transperitoneally before doing a TEP procedure in acute cases.
Keywords Laparoscopy, Total extraperitoneal repair, Incarcerated inguinal hernia
J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 139-143
Published online December 15, 2010
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
정춘식ㆍ이정은ㆍ조용걸ㆍ유상화ㆍ정규영ㆍ김승한ㆍ이동근
한솔병원 외과
Choon Sik Chung, M.D., Jeong Eun Lee, M.D., Yong Geul Joh, M.D., Sang Hwa Yu, M.D., Gyu Young Jeong, M.D., Seung Han Kim, M.D., Dong Keun Lee, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Hansol Hospital, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) has an advantage for evaluating the viability of incarcerated bowel. In this retrospective study, we aimed to review the data for use of the TEP technique in treating incarcerated hernias in order to document the feasibility of the laparoscopic procedure.
Methods: During a 2-year period from January 2008 to December 2009, one surgeon (C.S) at our institution operated on 27 patients with acutely (n=3) or chronically (n=24) incarcerated hernia. Incarcerated hernias were divided into acute or chronic types arbitrarily, based on who had symptoms of acute abdominal pain and signs of intestinal obstruction. For acute cases, the TEP procedure was done following laparoscopic transperitoneal evaluation to assess viability of the incarcerated bowel.
Results: All patients except one having a femoral hernia were male. Mean age was 41 years old (range, 25∼75). No case converted from a laparoscopic to an open procedure. Two acute incarcerated cases contained a segment of small bowel and the other contained small bowel and omentum. All acute cases were operated on successfully on an emergency basis by laparoscopic TEP repair. All chronic cases contained omentum without bowel. In one case of acute and seven cases of chronic type, a small inguinal incision was made to reduce hernia contents. No recurrence was noticed at a mean of 13 months of follow-up.
Conclusion: If there is no entrapment of bowel in chronic incarcerated cases, the TEP procedure will be satisfactory. It may be reasonable, however, to evaluate viability of bowel transperitoneally before doing a TEP procedure in acute cases.
Keywords: Laparoscopy, Total extraperitoneal repair, Incarcerated inguinal hernia
Kwang Hyun Kim, Eui Hyuk Chong, Incheon Kang, Sung Hwan Lee, Seok Jeong Yang
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 118-124Thanat Tantinam, Tawadchai Treeratanawikran, Pattiya Kamoncharoen, Ekawit Srimaneerak, Metpiya Siripoonsap, Thawatchai Phoonkaew
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 85-94Sung Seo Hwang, Heung-Kwon Oh, Hye-Rim Shin, Tae-Gyun Lee, Mi Jeong Choi, Min Hyeong Jo, Hong-min Ahn, Hyeonjeong Park, Hyun Hee Sim, Eunjeong Ji, Anuj Naresh Singhi, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2024; 27(2): 76-84