Purpose: Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is a common condition affecting infants that causes severe projectile non-bilious vomiting in the first few months of life. Although open pyloromyotomy is the standard treatment for HPS, recently, the laparoscopic approach has rapidly been adopted by pediatric surgeons. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy by comparing the clinical results of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy.
Methods: Between January 2007 and September 2012, a cohort of 69 children who underwent pyloromyotomy at Seoul National University Children's Hospital were followed; open pyloromyotomy (OP, n=56) and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP, n=13). A retrospective analysis of patient's characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with open or laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for HPS was performed. The evaluated characteristics included gestational age, sex, birth weight, age and weight at operation. Clinical outcomes included operation time, length of hospital stay, time to postoperative full feeds without vomiting, number of postoperative vomiting and complications.
Results: There were no significant differences in characteristics, length of hospital stay and time to postoperative full feeds without vomiting between the two groups. Incidence of postoperative vomiting in the LP group was significantly lower than that in the OP group (OP: 5.07±4.60 vs. LP: 2.00±2.16, p=0.035). In contrast, the operation time was longer, following the LP group (OP: 26.30±9.95 vs. LP: 44.15± 19.56, p＜0.001). Complications such as perforation of mucosal layer (OP: 2 vs. LP 1, p＞0.999) and wound problems (OP: 4 vs. LP 1, p＞0.999) were found to be similar in both groups.
Conclusion: Both open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy are safe procedures for the management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Incidence of vomiting was statistically superior in the laparoscopic group. In addition, postoperative complications were fewer in this group. However, an improvement in the operation time will be needed for the future development of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Keywords Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, Pyloromyotomy, Laparoscopy

1. Coran AG, Adzick NS. Pediatric surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby;2012. p.1021-1028.
2. Stellato TA. History of laparo scopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1992;72:997.
   
3. Deluruc A, Guys JM, Louis Borrione C, Simeoni J, Esposito C. Pediatric endoscopic surgery: pride and prejudice. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994;4:323.
   
4. Jones VS, Cohen RC. Two decades of minimally invasive pediatric surgery - taking st ock. J Pediatr Surg 2008;43:16531659.
   
5. Alain JL, Grousseau D, Terrier G. Extramucosal pyloromyotomy by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1991;5:174.
   
6. Kim SM, Jung SM, Seo JM, Lee SK. Comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg 2011;17:139-144.
7. Hirschsprung H. Falle von angeborener Pylorus Stenose. J Kinderheilk 1888;27:61.
8. Ramstedt C. Zur operation der angeborenen pylorus stenosis. Med Klinik 1912;8:1702-1705.
9. Campbell BT, McLean K, Barnhart DC. A comparison of laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a teaching hospital. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:1068.
   
10. Ostlie DJ, Holcomb GW. Open versus laparoscoic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Adv Surg 2007;41:81-91.
    
11. Yagmurlu A, Barnhart DC, Vernon A, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. Comparison of the incidence of complications in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a concurrent single institution series. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:292-296.
    
12. Hawasli A, Loyd LR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. the learning curve: report of 50 patients. Am Surg 1991;57:542-544.
    
13. Ford WD, Crameri JA, Holland AJ. The learning curve for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:552-554.
    
14. Greason KL, Thompson WR, Downey EC, Lo Sasso B. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile pyloric stenosis: report of 11 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1571-1574.
    
15. Siddiqui S, Heidel RE, Angel CA, Kennedy Jr AP. Pyloromyotomy: randomized control trial of laparoscopic vs open technique. J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:93-98.
    
16. St Peter SD, Holcomb GW, Calkins CM, et al. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006;244:363-370.
    
17. Spitz L. Vomiting after pylo romyotomy for infantile hypertro phic pyloric stenosis. Arch Dis Child 1979;54:886-889.
    
18. Scharli AF, Leditschke JF. Gastric motility after pylomyotomy in infants. A reappraisal of postoperative feeding. Surgery 1968;64:1133-1137.
    
19. Cambell BT, McVay MR, Lere r TJ, Lowe NJ, Smith SD, Kokoska ER. Ghosts in the machin e: a multi-institutional comparison of laparoscopic and op en pyloromyotomy at a teaching hospital. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:2026-2029.
    
20. Yagmurlu A, Barnhart DC, Vernon A, et al. Comparison of the incidence of complications in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: a concurrent single institution series. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:292.
    
21. Adibe O, Nichol PF, Flake AW, Mattei P. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic and open pyloromyotomy at a highvolume pediatric teaching hospita l. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1676-1678.
    
22. Ostile DJ, Woodall CE, Wade KR, et al. An effective pyloromyotomy length in infants unde rgoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Surgery 2004;136:827-832.