J Minim Invasive Surg 2015; 18(4): 113-120
Published online December 15, 2015
https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2015.18.4.113
© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between stent placement as a bridge to surgery and emergency surgery for obstructive colon cancer.
Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for left colon cancer and rectal cancer with total obstruction from September 2006 to October 2014 were enrolled. Data for the stent placement and emergency surgery groups were compared.
Results: Of the 67 patients with total obstruction, 53 patients were treated with stent placement and 14 patients were treated with emergency surgery. Significant differences were observed for surgical approach, type of operation, and combined resection. Use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was higher (88.6 vs. 42.9%, p<0.001) in the stent placement (SP) group, and combined resection (5.9 vs. 37.5%, p<0.001) was higher in the emergency surgery (EM) group. In the SP group, resection and anastomosis accounted for the largest proportion (92.5%) and in the EM group, Hartmann’s procedure was most common (57.1%) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in other operative outcomes or in postoperative courses. Five-year overall survival was 96.0 and 77.8% (p=0.311) in the SP and EM groups, respectively. Five-year disease-free survival for local recurrence in the SP and EM groups was 90.0 and 88.9% (p=0.904).
Conclusion: Stent placement as a bridge to surgery can be performed safely and represents an alternative to emergency surgery with good short-term results. Stent placement as a bridge to surgery is also comparable to emergency surgery in long-term outcomes.
Keywords Self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS), Colorectal neoplasm, Obstruction, Local recurrence
J Minim Invasive Surg 2015; 18(4): 113-120
Published online December 15, 2015 https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2015.18.4.113
Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.
Yu-Jin Choi, M.D., Jin Kim, M.D., Han-Deok Kwak, M.D., Dong-Woo Kang, M.D., Se-Jin Baek, M.D., Jung-Myun Kwak, M.D.,
Seon-Hahn Kim, M.D.
Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between stent placement as a bridge to surgery and emergency surgery for obstructive colon cancer.
Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for left colon cancer and rectal cancer with total obstruction from September 2006 to October 2014 were enrolled. Data for the stent placement and emergency surgery groups were compared.
Results: Of the 67 patients with total obstruction, 53 patients were treated with stent placement and 14 patients were treated with emergency surgery. Significant differences were observed for surgical approach, type of operation, and combined resection. Use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was higher (88.6 vs. 42.9%, p<0.001) in the stent placement (SP) group, and combined resection (5.9 vs. 37.5%, p<0.001) was higher in the emergency surgery (EM) group. In the SP group, resection and anastomosis accounted for the largest proportion (92.5%) and in the EM group, Hartmann’s procedure was most common (57.1%) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in other operative outcomes or in postoperative courses. Five-year overall survival was 96.0 and 77.8% (p=0.311) in the SP and EM groups, respectively. Five-year disease-free survival for local recurrence in the SP and EM groups was 90.0 and 88.9% (p=0.904).
Conclusion: Stent placement as a bridge to surgery can be performed safely and represents an alternative to emergency surgery with good short-term results. Stent placement as a bridge to surgery is also comparable to emergency surgery in long-term outcomes.
Keywords: Self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS), Colorectal neoplasm, Obstruction, Local recurrence
Ming-Yin Shen, M.D., Ph.D., William Tzu-Liang Chen, M.D.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2020; 23(4): 201-203Young Jin Kim, M.D., Ji Won Park, M.D., Ph.D., Han-Ki Lim, M.D., Yoon-Hye Kwon, M.D., Min Jung Kim, M.D., Eun Kyung Choe, M.D., Ph.D., Sang Hui Moon, M.D., Ph.D., Seung-Bum Ryoo, M.D., Ph.D., Seung-Yong Jeong, M.D., Ph.D., Kyu Joo Park, M.D., Ph.D.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2020; 23(4): 186-190Ji Hoon Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery 2020; 23(4): 159-160