Original Article

J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 69-73

Published online December 15, 2010

© The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery

합병성 충수염에서 시행된 복강경 충수절제술 및 개복 충수절제술의 비교

박성수ㆍ김해성ㆍ류병윤ㆍ김홍기ㆍ이정훈ㆍ이진원ㆍ최영희1

한림대학교 의과대학 외과학교실, 1병리학교실

Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis

Sung Soo Park, M.D., Hae Sung Kim, M.D., Byoung Yoon Ryu, M.D., Hong Ki Kim, M.D., Jung Hoon Lee, M.D., Jin Won Lee, M.D., Young Hee Choi, M.D.1

Departments of Surgery and 1Pathology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: The value of laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is still controversial. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with complicated appendicitis.
Methods: This study involved a total of 108 consecutive patients who had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between January 2008 and August 2009. Those patients were divided into two groups; laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). The demographic data, the incidence of drainage tube insertion, the operative time, the duration of pain, the time to a soft oral diet, the hospital days and the complication rate for the two groups were analyzed.
Results: There were no significant differences of the operative time (OA group: 65.2±27.31 min vs the LA group: 64.6±23.6 min) (p=0.233). However, in the LA group, there were benefits for number of drainage tube insertions (OA group: 48/60 vs the LA group: 8/48) (p<0.001), the use of analgesics (OA group: 3.2±3.9 times vs the LA group: 1.4±1.3 times) (p<0.001), the time to start a soft diet (OA group: 2.8±1.3 days vs the LA group: 1.4±1.3 days) (p=0.020), the hospital stay (OA group 7.5±3.4 days vs LA group 3.7±2.2 days) (p=0.040) and the complication rate (OA group: 18/60 vs the LA group: 8/48) (p<0.001).
Conclusion: These results suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy for treating complicated appendicitis is a safe procedure that may prove to have significant clinical advantages over open appendectomy.

Keywords Appendicitis, Laparoscopy, Appendectomy

Article

Original Article

J Minim Invasive Surg 2010; 13(2): 69-73

Published online December 15, 2010

Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery.

합병성 충수염에서 시행된 복강경 충수절제술 및 개복 충수절제술의 비교

박성수ㆍ김해성ㆍ류병윤ㆍ김홍기ㆍ이정훈ㆍ이진원ㆍ최영희1

한림대학교 의과대학 외과학교실, 1병리학교실

Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis

Sung Soo Park, M.D., Hae Sung Kim, M.D., Byoung Yoon Ryu, M.D., Hong Ki Kim, M.D., Jung Hoon Lee, M.D., Jin Won Lee, M.D., Young Hee Choi, M.D.1

Departments of Surgery and 1Pathology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose: The value of laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is still controversial. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with complicated appendicitis.
Methods: This study involved a total of 108 consecutive patients who had undergone appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between January 2008 and August 2009. Those patients were divided into two groups; laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). The demographic data, the incidence of drainage tube insertion, the operative time, the duration of pain, the time to a soft oral diet, the hospital days and the complication rate for the two groups were analyzed.
Results: There were no significant differences of the operative time (OA group: 65.2±27.31 min vs the LA group: 64.6±23.6 min) (p=0.233). However, in the LA group, there were benefits for number of drainage tube insertions (OA group: 48/60 vs the LA group: 8/48) (p<0.001), the use of analgesics (OA group: 3.2±3.9 times vs the LA group: 1.4±1.3 times) (p<0.001), the time to start a soft diet (OA group: 2.8±1.3 days vs the LA group: 1.4±1.3 days) (p=0.020), the hospital stay (OA group 7.5±3.4 days vs LA group 3.7±2.2 days) (p=0.040) and the complication rate (OA group: 18/60 vs the LA group: 8/48) (p<0.001).
Conclusion: These results suggest that laparoscopic appendectomy for treating complicated appendicitis is a safe procedure that may prove to have significant clinical advantages over open appendectomy.

Keywords: Appendicitis, Laparoscopy, Appendectomy

Share this article on

  • kakao talk
  • line

Related articles in JMIS

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

pISSN 2234-778X
eISSN 2234-5248